Kazakhstan vs Kyrgyzstan: Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Unconditional
Kazakhstan
24.6%
in 2021
Kyrgyzstan
26.4%
in 2020
Kazakhstan rank
12th
Kyrgyzstan rank
10th
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Unconditional over time
- Kazakhstan
- Kyrgyzstan
How they compare
Kyrgyzstan currently reports 26.4% against 24.6% in Kazakhstan, a difference of 1.8%.
That makes Kyrgyzstan's figure about 1.1 times Kazakhstan's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Kazakhstan ahead.
Kazakhstan ranks 12th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 10th of 24 countries.
Kyrgyzstan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kazakhstan | Kyrgyzstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 20.7% | 22.5% | 1.8% | Kyrgyzstan |
| 2020s | 25.3% | 26.4% | 1.2% | Kyrgyzstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - unconditional, Kazakhstan or Kyrgyzstan?
- Kyrgyzstan, at 26.4% against 24.6% in Kazakhstan as of 2020.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - unconditional between Kazakhstan and Kyrgyzstan?
- 1.8%, with Kyrgyzstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and Kyrgyzstan?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2020.
- How do Kazakhstan and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - unconditional?
- Kazakhstan ranks 12th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 10th of 24 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Unconditional Cash Transfers -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group