Indonesia vs Peru: Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Unconditional
Indonesia
8.7%
in 2022
Peru
9.3%
in 2022
Indonesia rank
18th
Peru rank
17th
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Unconditional over time
- Indonesia
- Peru
How they compare
Peru currently reports 9.3% against 8.7% in Indonesia, a difference of 0.6%.
That makes Peru's figure about 1.1 times Indonesia's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2018 it was Indonesia ahead.
Indonesia ranks 18th and Peru ranks 17th of 24 countries.
Peru has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Indonesia | Peru | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 7.7% | 10.6% | 2.9% | Peru |
| 2020s | 9.8% | 11.9% | 2.1% | Peru |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - unconditional, Indonesia or Peru?
- Peru, at 9.3% against 8.7% in Indonesia as of 2022.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - unconditional between Indonesia and Peru?
- 0.6%, with Peru ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Indonesia and Peru?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2018 to 2022.
- How do Indonesia and Peru rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - unconditional?
- Indonesia ranks 18th and Peru ranks 17th of 24 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Unconditional Cash Transfers -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group