Costa Rica vs Kyrgyzstan: Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Unconditional
Costa Rica
27.4%
in 2022
Kyrgyzstan
26.4%
in 2020
Costa Rica rank
9th
Kyrgyzstan rank
10th
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Unconditional over time
- Costa Rica
- Kyrgyzstan
How they compare
Costa Rica currently reports 27.4% against 26.4% in Kyrgyzstan, a difference of 1.0%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 9 shared years of data; in 2011 it was Costa Rica ahead.
Costa Rica ranks 9th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 10th of 24 countries.
Costa Rica has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Costa Rica | Kyrgyzstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 26.1% | 19.4% | 6.7% | Costa Rica |
| 2020s | 70.3% | 26.4% | 43.9% | Costa Rica |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - unconditional, Costa Rica or Kyrgyzstan?
- Costa Rica, at 27.4% against 26.4% in Kyrgyzstan as of 2022.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - unconditional between Costa Rica and Kyrgyzstan?
- 1.0%, with Costa Rica ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Kyrgyzstan?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2020.
- How do Costa Rica and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - unconditional?
- Costa Rica ranks 9th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 10th of 24 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Unconditional Cash Transfers -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group