Armenia vs Poland: Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Unconditional
Armenia
40.6%
in 2022
Poland
50.1%
in 2019
Armenia rank
6th
Poland rank
3rd
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Unconditional over time
- Armenia
- Poland
How they compare
Poland currently reports 50.1% against 40.6% in Armenia, a difference of 9.5%.
That makes Poland's figure about 1.2 times Armenia's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 9 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Armenia ahead.
Armenia ranks 6th and Poland ranks 3rd of 24 countries.
Armenia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Armenia | Poland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 31.9% | 22.9% | 9.0% | Armenia |
| 2010s | 34.5% | 28.1% | 6.4% | Armenia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - unconditional, Armenia or Poland?
- Poland, at 50.1% against 40.6% in Armenia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - unconditional between Armenia and Poland?
- 9.5%, with Poland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Poland?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2019.
- How do Armenia and Poland rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - unconditional?
- Armenia ranks 6th and Poland ranks 3rd of 24 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Unconditional Cash Transfers -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group