Armenia vs Costa Rica: Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Unconditional
Armenia
40.6%
in 2022
Costa Rica
27.4%
in 2022
Armenia rank
6th
Costa Rica rank
9th
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Unconditional over time
- Armenia
- Costa Rica
How they compare
Armenia currently reports 40.6% against 27.4% in Costa Rica, a difference of 13.2%.
That makes Armenia's figure about 1.5 times Costa Rica's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 13 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Armenia ahead.
Armenia ranks 6th and Costa Rica ranks 9th of 24 countries.
Armenia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Armenia | Costa Rica | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 30.6% | 23.3% | 7.3% | Armenia |
| 2010s | 34.6% | 25.4% | 9.1% | Armenia |
| 2020s | 46.1% | 41.9% | 4.2% | Armenia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - unconditional, Armenia or Costa Rica?
- Armenia, at 40.6% against 27.4% in Costa Rica as of 2022.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - unconditional between Armenia and Costa Rica?
- 13.2%, with Armenia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Costa Rica?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2022.
- How do Armenia and Costa Rica rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - unconditional?
- Armenia ranks 6th and Costa Rica ranks 9th of 24 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Unconditional Cash Transfers -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group