Mexico vs Mongolia: Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Unconditional
Mexico
21.1%
in 2020
Mongolia
18.0%
in 2020
Mexico rank
16th
Mongolia rank
17th
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Unconditional over time
- Mexico
- Mongolia
How they compare
Mexico currently reports 21.1% against 18.0% in Mongolia, a difference of 3.1%.
That makes Mexico's figure about 1.2 times Mongolia's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 6 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Mexico ahead.
Mexico ranks 16th and Mongolia ranks 17th of 26 countries.
Mexico has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mexico | Mongolia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 16.7% | 13.9% | 2.8% | Mexico |
| 2020s | 21.1% | 18.0% | 3.1% | Mexico |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - unconditional, Mexico or Mongolia?
- Mexico, at 21.1% against 18.0% in Mongolia as of 2020.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - unconditional between Mexico and Mongolia?
- 3.1%, with Mexico ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mexico and Mongolia?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2020.
- How do Mexico and Mongolia rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - unconditional?
- Mexico ranks 16th and Mongolia ranks 17th of 26 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Unconditional Cash Transfers (preT). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group