Georgia vs South Africa: Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - International
Georgia
62.0%
in 2021
South Africa
57.8%
in 2021
Georgia rank
7th
South Africa rank
8th
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - International over time
- Georgia
- South Africa
How they compare
Georgia currently reports 62.0% against 57.8% in South Africa, a difference of 4.2%.
That makes Georgia's figure about 1.1 times South Africa's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2016 it was Georgia ahead.
Georgia ranks 7th and South Africa ranks 8th of 27 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Georgia averaged higher in 1 and South Africa in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Georgia | South Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 65.2% | 78.9% | 13.7% | South Africa |
| 2020s | 57.5% | 57.1% | 0.4% | Georgia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - international, Georgia or South Africa?
- Georgia, at 62.0% against 57.8% in South Africa as of 2021.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - international between Georgia and South Africa?
- 4.2%, with Georgia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and South Africa?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2016 to 2021.
- How do Georgia and South Africa rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - international?
- Georgia ranks 7th and South Africa ranks 8th of 27 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - International Private Transfers. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group