Georgia vs Serbia: Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - International
Georgia
62.0%
in 2021
Serbia
76.2%
in 2022
Georgia rank
7th
Serbia rank
5th
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - International over time
- Georgia
- Serbia
How they compare
Serbia currently reports 76.2% against 62.0% in Georgia, a difference of 14.2%.
That makes Serbia's figure about 1.2 times Georgia's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2013 it was Serbia ahead.
Georgia ranks 7th and Serbia ranks 5th of 27 countries.
Serbia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Georgia | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 55.5% | 55.9% | 0.3% | Serbia |
| 2020s | 62.0% | 88.9% | 26.9% | Serbia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - international, Georgia or Serbia?
- Serbia, at 76.2% against 62.0% in Georgia as of 2022.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - international between Georgia and Serbia?
- 14.2%, with Serbia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and Serbia?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2013 to 2021.
- How do Georgia and Serbia rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - international?
- Georgia ranks 7th and Serbia ranks 5th of 27 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - International Private Transfers. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group