El Salvador vs Peru: Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - International
El Salvador
25.4%
in 2022
Peru
26.0%
in 2022
El Salvador rank
18th
Peru rank
17th
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - International over time
- El Salvador
- Peru
How they compare
Peru currently reports 26.0% against 25.4% in El Salvador, a difference of 0.6%.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 13 shared years of data; in 2008 it was El Salvador ahead.
El Salvador ranks 18th and Peru ranks 17th of 27 countries.
El Salvador has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | El Salvador | Peru | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 49.3% | 27.0% | 22.4% | El Salvador |
| 2010s | 49.0% | 22.0% | 27.0% | El Salvador |
| 2020s | 25.0% | 24.7% | 0.3% | El Salvador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - international, El Salvador or Peru?
- Peru, at 26.0% against 25.4% in El Salvador as of 2022.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - international between El Salvador and Peru?
- 0.6%, with Peru ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for El Salvador and Peru?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2022.
- How do El Salvador and Peru rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - international?
- El Salvador ranks 18th and Peru ranks 17th of 27 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - International Private Transfers. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group