Armenia vs Serbia: Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - International
Armenia
109.3%
in 2022
Serbia
76.2%
in 2022
Armenia rank
2nd
Serbia rank
5th
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - International over time
- Armenia
- Serbia
How they compare
Armenia currently reports 109.3% against 76.2% in Serbia, a difference of 33.1%.
That makes Armenia's figure about 1.4 times Serbia's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 7 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Armenia ahead.
Armenia ranks 2nd and Serbia ranks 5th of 27 countries.
Armenia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Armenia | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 102.8% | 56.0% | 46.8% | Armenia |
| 2020s | 117.7% | 82.5% | 35.2% | Armenia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - international, Armenia or Serbia?
- Armenia, at 109.3% against 76.2% in Serbia as of 2022.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - international between Armenia and Serbia?
- 33.1%, with Armenia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Serbia?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2022.
- How do Armenia and Serbia rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - international?
- Armenia ranks 2nd and Serbia ranks 5th of 27 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - International Private Transfers. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group