Armenia vs Poland: Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - International
Armenia
109.3%
in 2022
Poland
42,799.2%
in 2019
Armenia rank
2nd
Poland rank
1st
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - International over time
- Armenia
- Poland
How they compare
Poland currently reports 42,799.2% against 109.3% in Armenia, a difference of 42,689.9%.
That makes Poland's figure about 391.5 times Armenia's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 9 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Armenia ahead.
Armenia ranks 2nd and Poland ranks 1st of 27 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Armenia averaged higher in 1 and Poland in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Armenia | Poland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 81.2% | 56.5% | 24.7% | Armenia |
| 2010s | 121.6% | 6,165.8% | 6,044.2% | Poland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - international, Armenia or Poland?
- Poland, at 42,799.2% against 109.3% in Armenia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - international between Armenia and Poland?
- 42,689.9%, with Poland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Poland?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2019.
- How do Armenia and Poland rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - international?
- Armenia ranks 2nd and Poland ranks 1st of 27 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - International Private Transfers. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group