Mongolia vs Poland: Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - International
Mongolia
84.7%
in 2020
Poland
44,786.4%
in 2019
Mongolia rank
4th
Poland rank
1st
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - International over time
- Mongolia
- Poland
How they compare
Poland currently reports 44,786.4% against 84.7% in Mongolia, a difference of 44,701.7%.
That makes Poland's figure about 528.6 times Mongolia's.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Poland has been ahead every year.
Mongolia ranks 4th and Poland ranks 1st of 27 countries.
Poland has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mongolia | Poland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 4.7% | 61.1% | 56.5% | Poland |
| 2010s | 28.7% | 55.9% | 27.2% | Poland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - international, Mongolia or Poland?
- Poland, at 44,786.4% against 84.7% in Mongolia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - international between Mongolia and Poland?
- 44,701.7%, with Poland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mongolia and Poland?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2016.
- How do Mongolia and Poland rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - international?
- Mongolia ranks 4th and Poland ranks 1st of 27 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - International Private Transfers -urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group