Georgia vs South Africa: Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - International
Georgia
58.7%
in 2021
South Africa
60.0%
in 2021
Georgia rank
8th
South Africa rank
7th
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - International over time
- Georgia
- South Africa
How they compare
South Africa currently reports 60.0% against 58.7% in Georgia, a difference of 1.3%.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2016 it was Georgia ahead.
Georgia ranks 8th and South Africa ranks 7th of 27 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Georgia averaged higher in 1 and South Africa in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Georgia | South Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 66.4% | 74.7% | 8.3% | South Africa |
| 2020s | 62.5% | 61.1% | 1.4% | Georgia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - international, Georgia or South Africa?
- South Africa, at 60.0% against 58.7% in Georgia as of 2021.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - international between Georgia and South Africa?
- 1.3%, with South Africa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and South Africa?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2016 to 2021.
- How do Georgia and South Africa rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - international?
- Georgia ranks 8th and South Africa ranks 7th of 27 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - International Private Transfers -urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group