El Salvador vs Peru: Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - International
El Salvador
25.0%
in 2022
Peru
24.5%
in 2022
El Salvador rank
20th
Peru rank
21st
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - International over time
- El Salvador
- Peru
How they compare
El Salvador currently reports 25.0% against 24.5% in Peru, a difference of 0.5%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 13 shared years of data; in 2008 it was El Salvador ahead.
El Salvador ranks 20th and Peru ranks 21st of 27 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, El Salvador averaged higher in 2 and Peru in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | El Salvador | Peru | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 49.6% | 34.6% | 14.9% | El Salvador |
| 2010s | 45.3% | 20.3% | 25.0% | El Salvador |
| 2020s | 22.5% | 25.0% | 2.5% | Peru |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - international, El Salvador or Peru?
- El Salvador, at 25.0% against 24.5% in Peru as of 2022.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - international between El Salvador and Peru?
- 0.5%, with El Salvador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for El Salvador and Peru?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2022.
- How do El Salvador and Peru rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - international?
- El Salvador ranks 20th and Peru ranks 21st of 27 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - International Private Transfers -urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group