Dominican Republic vs Honduras: Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - International
Dominican Republic
28.6%
in 2021
Honduras
34.4%
in 2019
Dominican Republic rank
15th
Honduras rank
14th
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - International over time
- Dominican Republic
- Honduras
How they compare
Honduras currently reports 34.4% against 28.6% in Dominican Republic, a difference of 5.8%.
That makes Honduras's figure about 1.2 times Dominican Republic's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Honduras ahead.
Dominican Republic ranks 15th and Honduras ranks 14th of 27 countries.
Honduras has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Dominican Republic | Honduras | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 25.6% | 29.8% | 4.2% | Honduras |
| 2010s | 30.8% | 38.5% | 7.7% | Honduras |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - international, Dominican Republic or Honduras?
- Honduras, at 34.4% against 28.6% in Dominican Republic as of 2019.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - international between Dominican Republic and Honduras?
- 5.8%, with Honduras ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Dominican Republic and Honduras?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2019.
- How do Dominican Republic and Honduras rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - international?
- Dominican Republic ranks 15th and Honduras ranks 14th of 27 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - International Private Transfers -urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group