Armenia vs Poland: Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - International
Armenia
104.6%
in 2022
Poland
44,786.4%
in 2019
Armenia rank
2nd
Poland rank
1st
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - International over time
- Armenia
- Poland
How they compare
Poland currently reports 44,786.4% against 104.6% in Armenia, a difference of 44,681.8%.
That makes Poland's figure about 428.0 times Armenia's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 9 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Armenia ahead.
Armenia ranks 2nd and Poland ranks 1st of 27 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Armenia averaged higher in 1 and Poland in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Armenia | Poland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 83.2% | 51.1% | 32.1% | Armenia |
| 2010s | 121.5% | 6,445.2% | 6,323.7% | Poland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - international, Armenia or Poland?
- Poland, at 44,786.4% against 104.6% in Armenia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - international between Armenia and Poland?
- 44,681.8%, with Poland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Poland?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2019.
- How do Armenia and Poland rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - international?
- Armenia ranks 2nd and Poland ranks 1st of 27 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - International Private Transfers -urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group