Armenia vs Mongolia: Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - International
Armenia
104.6%
in 2022
Mongolia
84.7%
in 2020
Armenia rank
2nd
Mongolia rank
4th
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - International over time
- Armenia
- Mongolia
How they compare
Armenia currently reports 104.6% against 84.7% in Mongolia, a difference of 19.9%.
That makes Armenia's figure about 1.2 times Mongolia's.
Across all 8 years both countries report, Armenia has been ahead every year.
Armenia ranks 2nd and Mongolia ranks 4th of 27 countries.
Armenia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Armenia | Mongolia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 77.8% | 4.7% | 73.2% | Armenia |
| 2010s | 107.0% | 28.8% | 78.2% | Armenia |
| 2020s | 104.6% | 84.7% | 19.9% | Armenia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - international, Armenia or Mongolia?
- Armenia, at 104.6% against 84.7% in Mongolia as of 2022.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - international between Armenia and Mongolia?
- 19.9%, with Armenia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Mongolia?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2020.
- How do Armenia and Mongolia rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - international?
- Armenia ranks 2nd and Mongolia ranks 4th of 27 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - International Private Transfers -urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group