Mongolia vs Vietnam: Adequacy of benefits: International Private … 1st International preT
Mongolia
72.4%
in 2020
Vietnam
103.6%
in 2020
Mongolia rank
5th
Vietnam rank
3rd
Adequacy of benefits: International Private … 1st International preT over time
- Mongolia
- Vietnam
How they compare
Vietnam currently reports 103.6% against 72.4% in Mongolia, a difference of 31.2%.
That makes Vietnam's figure about 1.4 times Mongolia's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Vietnam ahead.
Mongolia ranks 5th and Vietnam ranks 3rd of 27 countries.
Vietnam has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mongolia | Vietnam | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 26.6% | 44.6% | 18.0% | Vietnam |
| 2020s | 72.4% | 103.6% | 31.1% | Vietnam |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - international, Mongolia or Vietnam?
- Vietnam, at 103.6% against 72.4% in Mongolia as of 2020.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - international between Mongolia and Vietnam?
- 31.2%, with Vietnam ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mongolia and Vietnam?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2020.
- How do Mongolia and Vietnam rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - international?
- Mongolia ranks 5th and Vietnam ranks 3rd of 27 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - International Private Transfers (preT). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group