Kyrgyzstan vs Vietnam: Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - International
Kyrgyzstan
81.7%
in 2020
Vietnam
103.6%
in 2020
Kyrgyzstan rank
4th
Vietnam rank
3rd
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - International over time
- Kyrgyzstan
- Vietnam
How they compare
Vietnam currently reports 103.6% against 81.7% in Kyrgyzstan, a difference of 21.9%.
That makes Vietnam's figure about 1.3 times Kyrgyzstan's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Kyrgyzstan ahead.
Kyrgyzstan ranks 4th and Vietnam ranks 3rd of 27 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Kyrgyzstan averaged higher in 2 and Vietnam in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kyrgyzstan | Vietnam | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 92.0% | 70.3% | 21.7% | Kyrgyzstan |
| 2010s | 87.4% | 49.1% | 38.3% | Kyrgyzstan |
| 2020s | 81.7% | 103.6% | 21.9% | Vietnam |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - international, Kyrgyzstan or Vietnam?
- Vietnam, at 103.6% against 81.7% in Kyrgyzstan as of 2020.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - international between Kyrgyzstan and Vietnam?
- 21.9%, with Vietnam ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kyrgyzstan and Vietnam?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2020.
- How do Kyrgyzstan and Vietnam rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - international?
- Kyrgyzstan ranks 4th and Vietnam ranks 3rd of 27 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - International Private Transfers (preT). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group