Georgia vs South Africa: Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - International
Georgia
55.5%
in 2021
South Africa
58.1%
in 2021
Georgia rank
9th
South Africa rank
7th
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - International over time
- Georgia
- South Africa
How they compare
South Africa currently reports 58.1% against 55.5% in Georgia, a difference of 2.6%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2016 it was South Africa ahead.
Georgia ranks 9th and South Africa ranks 7th of 27 countries.
South Africa has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Georgia | South Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 51.3% | 79.4% | 28.0% | South Africa |
| 2020s | 53.9% | 57.2% | 3.4% | South Africa |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - international, Georgia or South Africa?
- South Africa, at 58.1% against 55.5% in Georgia as of 2021.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - international between Georgia and South Africa?
- 2.6%, with South Africa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and South Africa?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2016 to 2021.
- How do Georgia and South Africa rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - international?
- Georgia ranks 9th and South Africa ranks 7th of 27 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - International Private Transfers (preT). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group