Dominican Republic vs Honduras: Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - International
Dominican Republic
26.6%
in 2021
Honduras
35.7%
in 2019
Dominican Republic rank
16th
Honduras rank
14th
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - International over time
- Dominican Republic
- Honduras
How they compare
Honduras currently reports 35.7% against 26.6% in Dominican Republic, a difference of 9.1%.
That makes Honduras's figure about 1.3 times Dominican Republic's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Honduras ahead.
Dominican Republic ranks 16th and Honduras ranks 14th of 27 countries.
Honduras has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Dominican Republic | Honduras | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 27.2% | 30.4% | 3.2% | Honduras |
| 2010s | 28.8% | 38.3% | 9.5% | Honduras |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - international, Dominican Republic or Honduras?
- Honduras, at 35.7% against 26.6% in Dominican Republic as of 2019.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - international between Dominican Republic and Honduras?
- 9.1%, with Honduras ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Dominican Republic and Honduras?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2019.
- How do Dominican Republic and Honduras rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - international?
- Dominican Republic ranks 16th and Honduras ranks 14th of 27 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - International Private Transfers (preT). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group