Mongolia vs Peru: Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Domestic Private
Mongolia
24.3%
in 2020
Peru
21.6%
in 2022
Mongolia rank
17th
Peru rank
19th
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Domestic Private over time
- Mongolia
- Peru
How they compare
Mongolia currently reports 24.3% against 21.6% in Peru, a difference of 2.7%.
That makes Mongolia's figure about 1.1 times Peru's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 8 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Peru ahead.
Mongolia ranks 17th and Peru ranks 19th of 31 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Mongolia averaged higher in 1 and Peru in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mongolia | Peru | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 17.0% | 20.1% | 3.1% | Peru |
| 2010s | 18.8% | 16.1% | 2.7% | Mongolia |
| 2020s | 24.3% | 24.4% | 0.1% | Peru |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - domestic private, Mongolia or Peru?
- Mongolia, at 24.3% against 21.6% in Peru as of 2020.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - domestic private between Mongolia and Peru?
- 2.7%, with Mongolia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mongolia and Peru?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2020.
- How do Mongolia and Peru rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - domestic private?
- Mongolia ranks 17th and Peru ranks 19th of 31 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Domestic Private Transfers. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group