El Salvador vs Uruguay: Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Domestic Private
El Salvador
20.0%
in 2022
Uruguay
21.0%
in 2022
El Salvador rank
23rd
Uruguay rank
21st
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Domestic Private over time
- El Salvador
- Uruguay
How they compare
Uruguay currently reports 21.0% against 20.0% in El Salvador, a difference of 1.0%.
That makes Uruguay's figure about 1.1 times El Salvador's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 12 shared years of data; in 2008 it was El Salvador ahead.
El Salvador ranks 23rd and Uruguay ranks 21st of 31 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, El Salvador averaged higher in 2 and Uruguay in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | El Salvador | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 33.0% | 23.0% | 10.0% | El Salvador |
| 2010s | 27.6% | 20.7% | 6.9% | El Salvador |
| 2020s | 19.5% | 21.6% | 2.1% | Uruguay |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - domestic private, El Salvador or Uruguay?
- Uruguay, at 21.0% against 20.0% in El Salvador as of 2022.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - domestic private between El Salvador and Uruguay?
- 1.0%, with Uruguay ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for El Salvador and Uruguay?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2022.
- How do El Salvador and Uruguay rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - domestic private?
- El Salvador ranks 23rd and Uruguay ranks 21st of 31 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Domestic Private Transfers. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group