Costa Rica vs Kyrgyzstan: Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Domestic Private
Costa Rica
34.8%
in 2022
Kyrgyzstan
35.7%
in 2020
Costa Rica rank
8th
Kyrgyzstan rank
6th
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Domestic Private over time
- Costa Rica
- Kyrgyzstan
How they compare
Kyrgyzstan currently reports 35.7% against 34.8% in Costa Rica, a difference of 0.9%.
Across all 9 years both countries report, Kyrgyzstan has been ahead every year.
Costa Rica ranks 8th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 6th of 31 countries.
Kyrgyzstan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Costa Rica | Kyrgyzstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 31.2% | 53.8% | 22.6% | Kyrgyzstan |
| 2020s | 35.0% | 35.7% | 0.7% | Kyrgyzstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - domestic private, Costa Rica or Kyrgyzstan?
- Kyrgyzstan, at 35.7% against 34.8% in Costa Rica as of 2020.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - domestic private between Costa Rica and Kyrgyzstan?
- 0.9%, with Kyrgyzstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Kyrgyzstan?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2020.
- How do Costa Rica and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - domestic private?
- Costa Rica ranks 8th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 6th of 31 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Domestic Private Transfers. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group