Chile vs Uruguay: Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Domestic Private
Chile
23.5%
in 2022
Uruguay
21.0%
in 2022
Chile rank
18th
Uruguay rank
21st
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Domestic Private over time
- Chile
- Uruguay
How they compare
Chile currently reports 23.5% against 21.0% in Uruguay, a difference of 2.5%.
That makes Chile's figure about 1.1 times Uruguay's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2011 it was Chile ahead.
Chile ranks 18th and Uruguay ranks 21st of 31 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 1 and Uruguay in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 31.9% | 21.0% | 10.9% | Chile |
| 2020s | 21.0% | 21.4% | 0.3% | Uruguay |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - domestic private, Chile or Uruguay?
- Chile, at 23.5% against 21.0% in Uruguay as of 2022.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - domestic private between Chile and Uruguay?
- 2.5%, with Chile ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Uruguay?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2022.
- How do Chile and Uruguay rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - domestic private?
- Chile ranks 18th and Uruguay ranks 21st of 31 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Domestic Private Transfers. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group