Armenia vs Chile: Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Domestic Private
Armenia
21.4%
in 2022
Chile
23.5%
in 2022
Armenia rank
20th
Chile rank
18th
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Domestic Private over time
- Armenia
- Chile
How they compare
Chile currently reports 23.5% against 21.4% in Armenia, a difference of 2.1%.
That makes Chile's figure about 1.1 times Armenia's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2011 it was Armenia ahead.
Armenia ranks 20th and Chile ranks 18th of 31 countries.
Armenia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Armenia | Chile | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 45.4% | 31.7% | 13.7% | Armenia |
| 2020s | 24.5% | 21.0% | 3.5% | Armenia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - domestic private, Armenia or Chile?
- Chile, at 23.5% against 21.4% in Armenia as of 2022.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - domestic private between Armenia and Chile?
- 2.1%, with Chile ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Chile?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2022.
- How do Armenia and Chile rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - domestic private?
- Armenia ranks 20th and Chile ranks 18th of 31 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Domestic Private Transfers. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group