Mongolia vs Peru: Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Domestic Private
Mongolia
25.2%
in 2020
Peru
23.5%
in 2022
Mongolia rank
15th
Peru rank
18th
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Domestic Private over time
- Mongolia
- Peru
How they compare
Mongolia currently reports 25.2% against 23.5% in Peru, a difference of 1.7%.
That makes Mongolia's figure about 1.1 times Peru's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 8 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Peru ahead.
Mongolia ranks 15th and Peru ranks 18th of 31 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Mongolia averaged higher in 1 and Peru in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mongolia | Peru | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 16.8% | 17.3% | 0.5% | Peru |
| 2010s | 19.7% | 18.1% | 1.6% | Mongolia |
| 2020s | 25.2% | 25.6% | 0.4% | Peru |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - domestic private, Mongolia or Peru?
- Mongolia, at 25.2% against 23.5% in Peru as of 2020.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - domestic private between Mongolia and Peru?
- 1.7%, with Mongolia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mongolia and Peru?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2020.
- How do Mongolia and Peru rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - domestic private?
- Mongolia ranks 15th and Peru ranks 18th of 31 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Domestic Private Transfers -urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group