Dominican Republic vs Poland: Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Domestic Private
Dominican Republic
37.7%
in 2021
Poland
12,283.7%
in 2019
Dominican Republic rank
4th
Poland rank
1st
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Domestic Private over time
- Dominican Republic
- Poland
How they compare
Poland currently reports 12,283.7% against 37.7% in Dominican Republic, a difference of 12,246.0%.
That makes Poland's figure about 325.9 times Dominican Republic's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Dominican Republic ahead.
Dominican Republic ranks 4th and Poland ranks 1st of 31 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Dominican Republic averaged higher in 1 and Poland in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Dominican Republic | Poland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 36.2% | 18.2% | 18.0% | Dominican Republic |
| 2010s | 33.9% | 1,771.4% | 1,737.5% | Poland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - domestic private, Dominican Republic or Poland?
- Poland, at 12,283.7% against 37.7% in Dominican Republic as of 2019.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - domestic private between Dominican Republic and Poland?
- 12,246.0%, with Poland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Dominican Republic and Poland?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2019.
- How do Dominican Republic and Poland rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - domestic private?
- Dominican Republic ranks 4th and Poland ranks 1st of 31 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Domestic Private Transfers -urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group