Chile vs Uruguay: Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Domestic Private
Chile
23.5%
in 2022
Uruguay
21.1%
in 2022
Chile rank
19th
Uruguay rank
21st
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Domestic Private over time
- Chile
- Uruguay
How they compare
Chile currently reports 23.5% against 21.1% in Uruguay, a difference of 2.4%.
That makes Chile's figure about 1.1 times Uruguay's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2011 it was Chile ahead.
Chile ranks 19th and Uruguay ranks 21st of 31 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 1 and Uruguay in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 32.1% | 21.0% | 11.0% | Chile |
| 2020s | 21.3% | 21.4% | 0.1% | Uruguay |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - domestic private, Chile or Uruguay?
- Chile, at 23.5% against 21.1% in Uruguay as of 2022.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - domestic private between Chile and Uruguay?
- 2.4%, with Chile ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Uruguay?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2022.
- How do Chile and Uruguay rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - domestic private?
- Chile ranks 19th and Uruguay ranks 21st of 31 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Domestic Private Transfers -urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group