Chile vs Peru: Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Domestic Private
Chile
23.5%
in 2022
Peru
23.5%
in 2022
Chile rank
19th
Peru rank
18th
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Domestic Private over time
- Chile
- Peru
How they compare
Peru currently reports 23.5% against 23.5% in Chile, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2011 it was Chile ahead.
Chile ranks 19th and Peru ranks 18th of 31 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 1 and Peru in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Peru | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 31.9% | 18.3% | 13.6% | Chile |
| 2020s | 21.3% | 24.6% | 3.3% | Peru |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - domestic private, Chile or Peru?
- Peru, at 23.5% against 23.5% in Chile as of 2022.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - domestic private between Chile and Peru?
- 0.0%, with Peru ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Peru?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2022.
- How do Chile and Peru rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - domestic private?
- Chile ranks 19th and Peru ranks 18th of 31 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Domestic Private Transfers -urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group