Argentina vs Kyrgyzstan: Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Domestic Private
Argentina
28.1%
in 2022
Kyrgyzstan
31.8%
in 2020
Argentina rank
11th
Kyrgyzstan rank
9th
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Domestic Private over time
- Argentina
- Kyrgyzstan
How they compare
Kyrgyzstan currently reports 31.8% against 28.1% in Argentina, a difference of 3.7%.
That makes Kyrgyzstan's figure about 1.1 times Argentina's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 7 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Argentina ahead.
Argentina ranks 11th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 9th of 31 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Argentina averaged higher in 1 and Kyrgyzstan in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Argentina | Kyrgyzstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 47.1% | 43.4% | 3.7% | Argentina |
| 2010s | 28.1% | 40.8% | 12.8% | Kyrgyzstan |
| 2020s | 22.3% | 31.8% | 9.5% | Kyrgyzstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - domestic private, Argentina or Kyrgyzstan?
- Kyrgyzstan, at 31.8% against 28.1% in Argentina as of 2020.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - domestic private between Argentina and Kyrgyzstan?
- 3.7%, with Kyrgyzstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Kyrgyzstan?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2020.
- How do Argentina and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - domestic private?
- Argentina ranks 11th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 9th of 31 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Domestic Private Transfers -urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group