Mongolia vs Uruguay: Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Domestic Private
Mongolia
19.6%
in 2020
Uruguay
14.3%
in 2022
Mongolia rank
23rd
Uruguay rank
26th
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Domestic Private over time
- Mongolia
- Uruguay
How they compare
Mongolia currently reports 19.6% against 14.3% in Uruguay, a difference of 5.3%.
That makes Mongolia's figure about 1.4 times Uruguay's.
Across all 7 years both countries report, Uruguay has been ahead every year.
Mongolia ranks 23rd and Uruguay ranks 26th of 30 countries.
Uruguay has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mongolia | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 16.3% | 21.4% | 5.1% | Uruguay |
| 2010s | 16.6% | 18.8% | 2.2% | Uruguay |
| 2020s | 19.6% | 20.2% | 0.7% | Uruguay |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - domestic private, Mongolia or Uruguay?
- Mongolia, at 19.6% against 14.3% in Uruguay as of 2020.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - domestic private between Mongolia and Uruguay?
- 5.3%, with Mongolia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mongolia and Uruguay?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2020.
- How do Mongolia and Uruguay rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - domestic private?
- Mongolia ranks 23rd and Uruguay ranks 26th of 30 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Domestic Private Transfers -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group