Mongolia vs Peru: Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Domestic Private
Mongolia
19.6%
in 2020
Peru
18.1%
in 2022
Mongolia rank
23rd
Peru rank
24th
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Domestic Private over time
- Mongolia
- Peru
How they compare
Mongolia currently reports 19.6% against 18.1% in Peru, a difference of 1.5%.
That makes Mongolia's figure about 1.1 times Peru's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 8 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Peru ahead.
Mongolia ranks 23rd and Peru ranks 24th of 30 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Mongolia averaged higher in 2 and Peru in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mongolia | Peru | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 16.3% | 24.1% | 7.8% | Peru |
| 2010s | 17.1% | 12.0% | 5.1% | Mongolia |
| 2020s | 19.6% | 13.9% | 5.7% | Mongolia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - domestic private, Mongolia or Peru?
- Mongolia, at 19.6% against 18.1% in Peru as of 2020.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - domestic private between Mongolia and Peru?
- 1.5%, with Mongolia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mongolia and Peru?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2020.
- How do Mongolia and Peru rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - domestic private?
- Mongolia ranks 23rd and Peru ranks 24th of 30 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Domestic Private Transfers -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group