Mongolia vs Panama: Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Domestic Private
Mongolia
19.6%
in 2020
Panama
20.2%
in 2023
Mongolia rank
23rd
Panama rank
21st
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Domestic Private over time
- Mongolia
- Panama
How they compare
Panama currently reports 20.2% against 19.6% in Mongolia, a difference of 0.6%.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 7 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Panama ahead.
Mongolia ranks 23rd and Panama ranks 21st of 30 countries.
Panama has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mongolia | Panama | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 16.3% | 24.6% | 8.3% | Panama |
| 2010s | 17.1% | 20.0% | 2.9% | Panama |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - domestic private, Mongolia or Panama?
- Panama, at 20.2% against 19.6% in Mongolia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - domestic private between Mongolia and Panama?
- 0.6%, with Panama ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mongolia and Panama?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2018.
- How do Mongolia and Panama rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - domestic private?
- Mongolia ranks 23rd and Panama ranks 21st of 30 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Domestic Private Transfers -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group