Kyrgyzstan vs Thailand: Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Domestic Private
Kyrgyzstan
38.5%
in 2020
Thailand
49.5%
in 2021
Kyrgyzstan rank
5th
Thailand rank
2nd
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Domestic Private over time
- Kyrgyzstan
- Thailand
How they compare
Thailand currently reports 49.5% against 38.5% in Kyrgyzstan, a difference of 11.0%.
That makes Thailand's figure about 1.3 times Kyrgyzstan's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Kyrgyzstan ahead.
Kyrgyzstan ranks 5th and Thailand ranks 2nd of 30 countries.
Kyrgyzstan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kyrgyzstan | Thailand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 49.3% | 2.2% | 47.1% | Kyrgyzstan |
| 2010s | 48.4% | 41.3% | 7.1% | Kyrgyzstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - domestic private, Kyrgyzstan or Thailand?
- Thailand, at 49.5% against 38.5% in Kyrgyzstan as of 2021.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - domestic private between Kyrgyzstan and Thailand?
- 11.0%, with Thailand ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kyrgyzstan and Thailand?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2019.
- How do Kyrgyzstan and Thailand rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - domestic private?
- Kyrgyzstan ranks 5th and Thailand ranks 2nd of 30 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Domestic Private Transfers -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group