Costa Rica vs Poland: Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Domestic Private
Costa Rica
39.0%
in 2022
Poland
9,379.4%
in 2019
Costa Rica rank
4th
Poland rank
1st
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Domestic Private over time
- Costa Rica
- Poland
How they compare
Poland currently reports 9,379.4% against 39.0% in Costa Rica, a difference of 9,340.4%.
That makes Poland's figure about 240.7 times Costa Rica's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 8 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Costa Rica ahead.
Costa Rica ranks 4th and Poland ranks 1st of 30 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Costa Rica averaged higher in 1 and Poland in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Costa Rica | Poland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 40.5% | 12.1% | 28.5% | Costa Rica |
| 2010s | 32.5% | 1,351.2% | 1,318.7% | Poland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - domestic private, Costa Rica or Poland?
- Poland, at 9,379.4% against 39.0% in Costa Rica as of 2019.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - domestic private between Costa Rica and Poland?
- 9,340.4%, with Poland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Poland?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2019.
- How do Costa Rica and Poland rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - domestic private?
- Costa Rica ranks 4th and Poland ranks 1st of 30 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Domestic Private Transfers -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group