Costa Rica vs Kyrgyzstan: Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Domestic Private
Costa Rica
39.0%
in 2022
Kyrgyzstan
38.5%
in 2020
Costa Rica rank
4th
Kyrgyzstan rank
5th
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Domestic Private over time
- Costa Rica
- Kyrgyzstan
How they compare
Costa Rica currently reports 39.0% against 38.5% in Kyrgyzstan, a difference of 0.5%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 9 shared years of data; in 2011 it was Costa Rica ahead.
Costa Rica ranks 4th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 5th of 30 countries.
Kyrgyzstan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Costa Rica | Kyrgyzstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 34.0% | 57.5% | 23.5% | Kyrgyzstan |
| 2020s | 35.3% | 38.5% | 3.2% | Kyrgyzstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - domestic private, Costa Rica or Kyrgyzstan?
- Costa Rica, at 39.0% against 38.5% in Kyrgyzstan as of 2022.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - domestic private between Costa Rica and Kyrgyzstan?
- 0.5%, with Costa Rica ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Kyrgyzstan?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2020.
- How do Costa Rica and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - domestic private?
- Costa Rica ranks 4th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 5th of 30 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Domestic Private Transfers -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group