Armenia vs Honduras: Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Domestic Private
Armenia
22.0%
in 2022
Honduras
22.8%
in 2019
Armenia rank
16th
Honduras rank
14th
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Domestic Private over time
- Armenia
- Honduras
How they compare
Honduras currently reports 22.8% against 22.0% in Armenia, a difference of 0.8%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 6 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Armenia ahead.
Armenia ranks 16th and Honduras ranks 14th of 30 countries.
Armenia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Armenia | Honduras | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 58.6% | 33.4% | 25.2% | Armenia |
| 2010s | 45.0% | 26.7% | 18.3% | Armenia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - domestic private, Armenia or Honduras?
- Honduras, at 22.8% against 22.0% in Armenia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - domestic private between Armenia and Honduras?
- 0.8%, with Honduras ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Honduras?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2019.
- How do Armenia and Honduras rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - domestic private?
- Armenia ranks 16th and Honduras ranks 14th of 30 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Domestic Private Transfers -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group