El Salvador vs Kazakhstan: Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Domestic Private
El Salvador
19.4%
in 2022
Kazakhstan
20.2%
in 2021
El Salvador rank
24th
Kazakhstan rank
21st
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Domestic Private over time
- El Salvador
- Kazakhstan
How they compare
Kazakhstan currently reports 20.2% against 19.4% in El Salvador, a difference of 0.8%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 7 shared years of data; in 2010 it was El Salvador ahead.
El Salvador ranks 24th and Kazakhstan ranks 21st of 31 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, El Salvador averaged higher in 1 and Kazakhstan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | El Salvador | Kazakhstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 28.0% | 14.4% | 13.6% | El Salvador |
| 2020s | 19.3% | 20.2% | 0.9% | Kazakhstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - domestic private, El Salvador or Kazakhstan?
- Kazakhstan, at 20.2% against 19.4% in El Salvador as of 2021.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - domestic private between El Salvador and Kazakhstan?
- 0.8%, with Kazakhstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for El Salvador and Kazakhstan?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2021.
- How do El Salvador and Kazakhstan rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - domestic private?
- El Salvador ranks 24th and Kazakhstan ranks 21st of 31 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Domestic Private Transfers (preT). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group