Kazakhstan vs Kyrgyzstan: Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -All Social
Kazakhstan
48.6%
in 2021
Kyrgyzstan
54.9%
in 2020
Kazakhstan rank
10th
Kyrgyzstan rank
9th
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -All Social over time
- Kazakhstan
- Kyrgyzstan
How they compare
Kyrgyzstan currently reports 54.9% against 48.6% in Kazakhstan, a difference of 6.3%.
That makes Kyrgyzstan's figure about 1.1 times Kazakhstan's.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Kyrgyzstan has been ahead every year.
Kazakhstan ranks 10th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 9th of 37 countries.
Kyrgyzstan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kazakhstan | Kyrgyzstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 41.6% | 54.4% | 12.8% | Kyrgyzstan |
| 2020s | 52.9% | 54.9% | 2.0% | Kyrgyzstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -all social, Kazakhstan or Kyrgyzstan?
- Kyrgyzstan, at 54.9% against 48.6% in Kazakhstan as of 2020.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -all social between Kazakhstan and Kyrgyzstan?
- 6.3%, with Kyrgyzstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and Kyrgyzstan?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2020.
- How do Kazakhstan and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -all social?
- Kazakhstan ranks 10th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 9th of 37 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -All Social Protection and Labor. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group