Chile vs Panama: Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -All Social
Chile
30.9%
in 2022
Panama
31.4%
in 2023
Chile rank
19th
Panama rank
18th
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -All Social over time
- Chile
- Panama
How they compare
Panama currently reports 31.4% against 30.9% in Chile, a difference of 0.5%.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Chile ahead.
Chile ranks 19th and Panama ranks 18th of 37 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 1 and Panama in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Panama | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 25.4% | 19.5% | 5.8% | Chile |
| 2010s | 19.0% | 26.5% | 7.5% | Panama |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -all social, Chile or Panama?
- Panama, at 31.4% against 30.9% in Chile as of 2023.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -all social between Chile and Panama?
- 0.5%, with Panama ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Panama?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2017.
- How do Chile and Panama rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -all social?
- Chile ranks 19th and Panama ranks 18th of 37 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -All Social Protection and Labor. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group