Brazil vs Kyrgyzstan: Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -All Social
Brazil
47.1%
in 2022
Kyrgyzstan
54.9%
in 2020
Brazil rank
11th
Kyrgyzstan rank
9th
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -All Social over time
- Brazil
- Kyrgyzstan
How they compare
Kyrgyzstan currently reports 54.9% against 47.1% in Brazil, a difference of 7.8%.
That makes Kyrgyzstan's figure about 1.2 times Brazil's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 9 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Brazil ahead.
Brazil ranks 11th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 9th of 37 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Brazil averaged higher in 2 and Kyrgyzstan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brazil | Kyrgyzstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 66.3% | 38.0% | 28.3% | Brazil |
| 2010s | 38.8% | 52.1% | 13.2% | Kyrgyzstan |
| 2020s | 56.8% | 54.9% | 1.9% | Brazil |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -all social, Brazil or Kyrgyzstan?
- Kyrgyzstan, at 54.9% against 47.1% in Brazil as of 2020.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -all social between Brazil and Kyrgyzstan?
- 7.8%, with Kyrgyzstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Kyrgyzstan?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2020.
- How do Brazil and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -all social?
- Brazil ranks 11th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 9th of 37 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -All Social Protection and Labor. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group