Belarus vs Serbia: Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -All Social
Belarus
69.2%
in 2019
Serbia
80.8%
in 2022
Belarus rank
4th
Serbia rank
3rd
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -All Social over time
- Belarus
- Serbia
How they compare
Serbia currently reports 80.8% against 69.2% in Belarus, a difference of 11.6%.
That makes Serbia's figure about 1.2 times Belarus's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Serbia ahead.
Belarus ranks 4th and Serbia ranks 3rd of 37 countries.
Serbia has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -all social, Belarus or Serbia?
- Serbia, at 80.8% against 69.2% in Belarus as of 2022.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -all social between Belarus and Serbia?
- 11.6%, with Serbia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Serbia?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2019.
- How do Belarus and Serbia rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -all social?
- Belarus ranks 4th and Serbia ranks 3rd of 37 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -All Social Protection and Labor. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group