Belarus vs Georgia: Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -All Social
Belarus
69.2%
in 2019
Georgia
93.6%
in 2021
Belarus rank
4th
Georgia rank
1st
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -All Social over time
- Belarus
- Georgia
How they compare
Georgia currently reports 93.6% against 69.2% in Belarus, a difference of 24.4%.
That makes Georgia's figure about 1.4 times Belarus's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 8 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Georgia ahead.
Belarus ranks 4th and Georgia ranks 1st of 37 countries.
Georgia has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -all social, Belarus or Georgia?
- Georgia, at 93.6% against 69.2% in Belarus as of 2021.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -all social between Belarus and Georgia?
- 24.4%, with Georgia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Georgia?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2019.
- How do Belarus and Georgia rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -all social?
- Belarus ranks 4th and Georgia ranks 1st of 37 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -All Social Protection and Labor. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group