Armenia vs Belarus: Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -All Social
Armenia
62.2%
in 2022
Belarus
69.2%
in 2019
Armenia rank
6th
Belarus rank
4th
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -All Social over time
- Armenia
- Belarus
How they compare
Belarus currently reports 69.2% against 62.2% in Armenia, a difference of 7.0%.
That makes Belarus's figure about 1.1 times Armenia's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 11 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Belarus ahead.
Armenia ranks 6th and Belarus ranks 4th of 37 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Armenia averaged higher in 1 and Belarus in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Armenia | Belarus | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 52.1% | 51.4% | 0.7% | Armenia |
| 2010s | 59.7% | 70.1% | 10.5% | Belarus |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -all social, Armenia or Belarus?
- Belarus, at 69.2% against 62.2% in Armenia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -all social between Armenia and Belarus?
- 7.0%, with Belarus ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Belarus?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2019.
- How do Armenia and Belarus rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -all social?
- Armenia ranks 6th and Belarus ranks 4th of 37 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -All Social Protection and Labor. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group