Kazakhstan vs Kyrgyzstan: Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -All Social
Kazakhstan
51.6%
in 2021
Kyrgyzstan
53.1%
in 2020
Kazakhstan rank
13th
Kyrgyzstan rank
11th
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -All Social over time
- Kazakhstan
- Kyrgyzstan
How they compare
Kyrgyzstan currently reports 53.1% against 51.6% in Kazakhstan, a difference of 1.5%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Kyrgyzstan ahead.
Kazakhstan ranks 13th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 11th of 36 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Kazakhstan averaged higher in 1 and Kyrgyzstan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kazakhstan | Kyrgyzstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 42.8% | 58.1% | 15.3% | Kyrgyzstan |
| 2020s | 54.0% | 53.1% | 0.8% | Kazakhstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -all social, Kazakhstan or Kyrgyzstan?
- Kyrgyzstan, at 53.1% against 51.6% in Kazakhstan as of 2020.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -all social between Kazakhstan and Kyrgyzstan?
- 1.5%, with Kyrgyzstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and Kyrgyzstan?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2020.
- How do Kazakhstan and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -all social?
- Kazakhstan ranks 13th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 11th of 36 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -All Social Protection and Labor -urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group