Georgia vs Serbia: Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -All Social
Georgia
83.6%
in 2021
Serbia
87.1%
in 2022
Georgia rank
3rd
Serbia rank
2nd
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -All Social over time
- Georgia
- Serbia
How they compare
Serbia currently reports 87.1% against 83.6% in Georgia, a difference of 3.5%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2013 it was Georgia ahead.
Georgia ranks 3rd and Serbia ranks 2nd of 36 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Georgia averaged higher in 1 and Serbia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Georgia | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 74.4% | 73.0% | 1.5% | Georgia |
| 2020s | 83.6% | 85.1% | 1.5% | Serbia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -all social, Georgia or Serbia?
- Serbia, at 87.1% against 83.6% in Georgia as of 2022.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -all social between Georgia and Serbia?
- 3.5%, with Serbia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and Serbia?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2013 to 2021.
- How do Georgia and Serbia rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -all social?
- Georgia ranks 3rd and Serbia ranks 2nd of 36 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -All Social Protection and Labor -urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group