Dominican Republic vs Pakistan: Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -All Social
Dominican Republic
16.1%
in 2021
Pakistan
11.1%
in 2018
Dominican Republic rank
28th
Pakistan rank
30th
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -All Social over time
- Dominican Republic
- Pakistan
How they compare
Dominican Republic currently reports 16.1% against 11.1% in Pakistan, a difference of 5.0%.
That makes Dominican Republic's figure about 1.5 times Pakistan's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Pakistan ahead.
Dominican Republic ranks 28th and Pakistan ranks 30th of 36 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Dominican Republic averaged higher in 1 and Pakistan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Dominican Republic | Pakistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 14.4% | 17.6% | 3.2% | Pakistan |
| 2010s | 13.3% | 11.0% | 2.3% | Dominican Republic |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -all social, Dominican Republic or Pakistan?
- Dominican Republic, at 16.1% against 11.1% in Pakistan as of 2021.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -all social between Dominican Republic and Pakistan?
- 5.0%, with Dominican Republic ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Dominican Republic and Pakistan?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2018.
- How do Dominican Republic and Pakistan rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -all social?
- Dominican Republic ranks 28th and Pakistan ranks 30th of 36 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -All Social Protection and Labor -urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group