Brazil vs Mongolia: Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -All Social
Brazil
44.4%
in 2022
Mongolia
38.4%
in 2020
Brazil rank
16th
Mongolia rank
17th
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -All Social over time
- Brazil
- Mongolia
How they compare
Brazil currently reports 44.4% against 38.4% in Mongolia, a difference of 6.0%.
That makes Brazil's figure about 1.2 times Mongolia's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 6 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Brazil ahead.
Brazil ranks 16th and Mongolia ranks 17th of 36 countries.
Brazil has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brazil | Mongolia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 48.0% | 32.5% | 15.5% | Brazil |
| 2010s | 39.0% | 38.5% | 0.5% | Brazil |
| 2020s | 52.7% | 38.4% | 14.3% | Brazil |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -all social, Brazil or Mongolia?
- Brazil, at 44.4% against 38.4% in Mongolia as of 2022.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -all social between Brazil and Mongolia?
- 6.0%, with Brazil ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Mongolia?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2020.
- How do Brazil and Mongolia rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -all social?
- Brazil ranks 16th and Mongolia ranks 17th of 36 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -All Social Protection and Labor -urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group