Belarus vs South Africa: Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -All Social
Belarus
67.6%
in 2019
South Africa
69.6%
in 2021
Belarus rank
5th
South Africa rank
4th
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -All Social over time
- Belarus
- South Africa
How they compare
South Africa currently reports 69.6% against 67.6% in Belarus, a difference of 2.0%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2010 it was South Africa ahead.
Belarus ranks 5th and South Africa ranks 4th of 36 countries.
South Africa has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -all social, Belarus or South Africa?
- South Africa, at 69.6% against 67.6% in Belarus as of 2021.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -all social between Belarus and South Africa?
- 2.0%, with South Africa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and South Africa?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2019.
- How do Belarus and South Africa rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -all social?
- Belarus ranks 5th and South Africa ranks 4th of 36 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -All Social Protection and Labor -urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group